Bunnings' proposed move from Bunbury to Dalyellup has ignited a heated political debate, with a myriad of stakeholders voicing their concerns. The $70 million relocation, which promises to create 60 new jobs, has sparked a heated debate over corporate responsibility, urban development, and the impact on local businesses and housing. The decision has also raised questions about the suitability of the new site and the potential displacement of residential land.
The public outcry is particularly intense due to the timing of the move. With Bunbury's CBD already facing revitalization efforts, there are fears that Bunnings' departure will further marginalize the city's retail scene. The concerns are exacerbated by the fact that the proposed new site is zoned for urban development, which allows for a mix of uses, and has been set aside for residential use under the shire's structure plan. However, Capel council officers argue that the land may no longer be appropriate for residential use due to its proximity to a major highway connection.
The political angle to this story is multifaceted. Federal Liberal MP Ben Small has been vocal in his opposition to the move, citing the lack of sufficient housing as a critical issue in the South West. He has called for the planning authorities to refuse the development application, arguing that the land should be used for housing. This stance has raised questions about the independence of his decision, given his past commercial and personal relationship with Bunnings' landlord, Michael Prosser.
The relationship between Mr. Small and Mr. Prosser is a complex one. As an individual, Mr. Prosser previously held joint ownership of a local bar with Mr. Small, and his family has grown a property empire in Bunbury, known as Citygate Properties, which owns the Homemakers Centre where Bunnings is located. Mr. Small has insisted that his views on the matter are independent of this relationship, emphasizing his commitment to independent decision-making.
The debate over Bunnings' move also highlights the broader issue of corporate responsibility. Queensland University of Technology retail researcher Gary Mortimer argues that Bunnings, like other big-box retailers, often faces criticism when it moves into an area, not when it leaves. He suggests that the same standard does not exist for other retailers, implying that Bunnings is being unfairly targeted. The Shire of Capel is set to vote on the development plan tonight, with the final decision resting with the WA Planning Commission (WAPC).
In conclusion, Bunnings' move from Bunbury to Dalyellup is a complex issue that raises questions about corporate responsibility, urban development, and political independence. The public outcry and political debate highlight the deep-seated concerns of the community and the need for careful consideration of the broader implications of such decisions.
